home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- On Mon, 29 Jan 1996, Johan Klockars wrote:
-
- > Has it even been said clearly if this is FreeWare, PD or GPL (or whatever)?
- > (Does anyone have a short description of what the GPL means, by the way?)
-
- I know all there is to know about the GPL (i'm making a CD-rom with a lot
- of GPL'ed stuff on it so it was necesary).
-
- In short, the general idea is this:
-
- Source code must always be included with the product when distributed, if
- not (that is, banaryonly form) the party who distributes the software has
- to include a written statement valid for at least 3 years that he will,
- free of charge give out the source to him (or point him to a place where
- he can find the course, free of charge).
-
- Restriction of distribution is strictly forbidden. I.e. it is NOT legal
- to refuse to give the program or it's source code.
-
- Anyone may charge as much or as little he wants for the software but if
- the recepient of the sofware asks for example on which FTP site it can be
- found, you're not allowed to withhold that information.
-
- Anyone may change the code, or basically do whatever he want's with it AS
- LONG AS the resulting product is also placed under the GPL.
-
- The fourth section is the most important, it is called "derivitive work"
- in the GPL. Now, there is a way to release Bad Mood under the GPL and
- still have the DSP code in binary-only form. That is, if we have a very
- good specification of the interface between the DSP code and the rest of
- the '030 code then we could consider the DSP code to be a library.
-
- The only thing that would then be required is that it should be easy to
- replace the DSP code with another version that does the exatctly same
- thing. It would then be up the user if he want's to use a fast
- "proprietary" version or a (perhaps) slower, but public, version. This
- solution is in no way in cinflict with the GPL.
-
- --
- Elias Martenson
- elias@omicron.se
-
-